Skip to main content

Would the play writer reveal his work-in-progress?



Everybody gets to play a role, but each of us is dissatisfied with the role we are playing. The play writer, in his confused state of mental aptitude, sketches the character. But, the character wishes to have more, he struggles to pin down accurately his feelings and fantasies of the person he would like to play. The more he plays himself, the more he fantasizes, and eventually the point of breakdown occurs, wherefrom he no longer realizes the inconsistency in his role play. He looks down upon himself, depressed, always in anticipation of something wonderful, something fanciful. He, the character loses himself, as the play writer watches in a seamless isolation, for he is the play writer and the character; for he is the narrator and the audience; for he is all there is to it; for it is his story that he is living and playing, constantly as if in a movie that never ends, as a book with perpetual addition of leaves.

With every step he takes, every action he performs, he is constantly vigilant as is he is being watched constantly, from close by, so close that he can feel it, palpable. Perhaps, it is true, for he is anticipatory; he is reading his own life story, as if he is reading about a person who is presently dead. He doesn’t feel well; he doesn’t feel controlled, as if by the sheer intensity of life dragging him, he dolefully lets himself go by.

The play is about him, a person close to him but not him, not truly, for he is as anxious to know the outcome as much as every other individual in the audience. Life goes on, his play goes on, he plays on, mutely watches, silently admires. The melancholy of the play inherently approves of his character’s emotional turmoil; he wonders if he is playing the character well? He wonders if, in his state of repressed fantasies, the expression is spoilt; wonders if the correctness of play if justified by what is going to be played on the stage as he watches horrifically seated immobile on a chair, distant and sad.

How does anybody for that matter know what he is supposed to play? The play is all known by heart to the character, but the play usually reveals itself at the moment of play and not before that. The pages in the book are all sealed, in the time one takes to tear off the plaster and peruse through the contents of the following page; the concurrent events unfold with the character playing his role on stage of life.

But, the play has to end sometime or another, it has to end. The book has to end, story concluded, for the player retires, for the player runs out of his creative faculties. How can one know his play and perform well? Can the character, play writer and the audience sit together and arrive at a consensus? If there is a consensus, would the character have access to the material? Would the audience approve of it? Would the play writer reveal his work-in-progress?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entrenched Prejudices taking the form of Patriotism

What a great way to celebrate the Independence Day? I am bemused, apparently owing to the wide exposure of emotional experiences hitherto seemed innocuous. Delve a little deep into the acquaintance with idea "patriotism", one will invariably be granted with an uncalled inquisition, one gets to stare at a disconcerting vacuum. Why do we brand ourselves with nations that are a mere collection of geographically propelled, culturally augmented, self aggrandizing people? Answer is elusive to many for the reasons best known to them hitherto for their own good are turning skeptical now. Man whom the evolutionists assert shares a common ancestor with chimps and gibbons, naturally after parting his ways with his cousins (chimps, gibbons) choose to retain a comprehensive emotional, physiological and mental disposition. Man, if he ever chooses to embark on a space ship that supposedly travels back in time is bound to diminish his self esteem owing to his impromptu urge to track his ance...

And, sazia was born for the first time!

Double slit experiment consists of a measured release of one photon through a giant thick impervious sheet with two slits drilled into it. The photon has to pass through one of the two slits and hit the screen on the other side of the impervious sheet leaving its mark. The paradox here is that instead of leaving a single mark, the single photon left an interference pattern. How could that be? How could a single photon make an interference pattern-it either passes through one slit or another, either which way, it should only leave a single mark on the screen. But the single photon was leaving an interference pattern. The phenomenon baffled scientists for over half a century. Sazia began by trying to find out which one of the two slits the photon was passing through. But the moment, she found out which one, the interference pattern was no longer there, the photon merely left a single mark on the screen. She tried a multitude of different techniques in widely varying settings and still fa...

Photograph

I was born at about 8 PM on April the fourth, in the pleasant summer of 1994; the night was calm and the four walls of my birth place imposed a thick blank darkness about me right from the birth. My mother’s umbilical cords wound around a thin cylinder; I was the 24th to be inseminated by the index finger of a nineteen year old pimpled primate. Before me, the others were put to sleep in sets of clearly delineated columns; around the cylinder, they all crooned about in good health. Our embryonic development was constrained between two rows of perforated umbilical cords. I distinctly remember, at the time of my birth, a great blinding flash of light pierced through me; it lasted for less than a second, but it was the most harrowing time I have had. You might be wondering why our mother ‘Kodak’ was so utterly circumspect; to understand this, I must, with your permission, take you down the path of evolution. In the olden days, a specialised primate ‘photographer’ peered through the well ...